Institutional Denialism

From the President's speeches to the formation of the Early Treatment Agenda (Off Label) in the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil

Autores

Palavras-chave:

Denialism, Institutional denialism, Agenda Setting, Bolsonaro, COVID-19 pandemic

Resumo

Since the early efforts of Schattschneider (1960) and Bachrach and Baratz (1962), and further with the conceptualization of "policy agenda-setting" by Cobb and Elder (1971), studies on agenda formation have advanced. The Multiple Streams Model proposed by Kingdon (1984) emphasizes the interaction between problem, policy, and political streams as central elements in the agenda. Recent studies also explore the content analysis of presidential speeches and legislative productions as complementary approaches. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the convergence of these approaches sheds light on the process of public policy agenda formation and the role of political actors. In such a context this article proposes to reflect “What are the relations between the denialist discourses promoted by then President Bolsonaro and public policies during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil?”, seeking to investigate potential institutional denialism supported by denialist discourses. Web scraping techniques are used in Python to extract various types of content related to Bolsonaro during the COVID-19 pandemic, including false statements, tweets, Telegram posts, and government publications. The extracted content is filtered to focus on the early treatment agenda and denialist positions regarding vaccines, lockdown, and mask usage.

Biografia do Autor

Ergon Cugler de Moraes Silva, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EAESP)

Ergon Cugler de Moraes Silva é Pesquisador CNPq (Bolsa: #130022/2022-5). É Mestrando em Administração Pública e Governo (FGV EAESP), MBA em Data Science & Analytcs (USP ESALQ) e Bacharel em Gestão de Políticas Públicas (USP EACH). É associado ao Núcleo de Estudos da Burocracia (NEB). Colabora com o Observatório Interdisciplinar de Políticas Públicas (OIPP), o Grupo de Estudos em Tecnologia e Inovações na Gestão Pública (GETIP), o Tracker (OxCGRT) da Blavatnik School of Government (BSG), da Oxford University e o Monitor do Debate Político no Meio Digital (Monitor USP). Desde 2022, é Embaixador de Inovação Cívica da Open Knowledge Brasil (OKBR). Compõe também a Coalizão Direitos na Rede (CDR) e a Sala de Articulação contra a Desinformação (SAD), onde representa o Centro de Estudos de Mídias Alternativas Barão de Itararé.

Downloads

Publicado

2024-01-04

Edição

Seção

ST 14 - Agenda-setting e Formulação de Políticas Públicas